A beautiful song, performed by the Choral Project. Includes a duet with the marvelous and talented Kristin Baxter. See if you can hear her beautiful voice.
If that Quicktime player doesn't work, you should be able to download the file by clicking on the next link and saving the file to your computer and playing it from there. Here's the link:
Click here to download.
Monday, December 26, 2011
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
The Choral Project
Joyful sounds poured forth from the Center for Spiritual Living in Willow Glen on a recent Sunday morning. Performing a variety of songs for those assembled was a local choral group with international experience.
The Choral Project was founded in 1996 by Artistic Director Daniel Hughes. He wanted “to create an ensemble that would share concerts specifically intended to transform and heal.” The forty-member ensemble, many of whom come from Willow Glen and other San Jose neighborhoods, rehearses weekly at Le Petit Trianon Theatre in downtown San Jose and performs around the Bay Area and beyond.
Variety is the spice of the Choral Project. They have performed music from the Medieval Period (c. 1000-1250) to 20th-century works, to works that have been written specifically for the choir, and they regularly feature music from other cultures around the globe.
The Willow Glen performance included four songs in three languages. From a rousing Sephardic love song to a toe-tapping spiritual, the Choral Project thrilled the audience and earned multiple standing ovations. One song included five percussionists and another incorporated full choreography—while singing in Japanese.
Therein lies the genius of Hughes. By incorporating “choralography” and instrumentation with a set list that explores stirring melodies as well as more complex pieces, he makes it accessible for even the most casual listener. Whether you are a true aficionado of choral music or you are visiting it for the first time, you could do no better than a Choral Project concert.
Being an organization strongly rooted in education, the group has several outreach programs designed to assist youthful enthusiasts of choral music. The Composition Contest is an opportunity for high school and undergraduate students to flex their muscles with choral writing. Three winners are selected, and their works are performed in the final concert of each season.
In the Mentorship Program, high school students from around the Bay Area apply (via essay and video audition) to participate in concert preparation and one performance during the season. They sing a portion of a concert's set, attending the rehearsals and group activities leading up to that concert.
The Choral Project also started a choral festival in which the very best high schools from the Bay Area (and slightly beyond) can come and sing a set showcasing their fine artistic work. The Choral Project sings for them in kind, and then all the participating choirs join with The Choral Project en masse for some thrilling music making.
All of these programs are designed to keep the fire of choral singing alive in the young people who will become the next generation of choral singers.
The group will be closing their successful fifteenth season in June with a concert entitled Voices of Crystal. Highlights include pieces by Francis Poulenc, Lili Boulanger, Irving Fine, Eric Whitacre, Stephen Schwartz, and Maurice Duruflé, as well as spirituals, rousing gospel music, and folk music from around the globe.
Performances will be at Holy Cross Church in Santa Cruz on Sunday, June 12, at 4:00 pm and Mission Santa Clara de Asis in Santa Clara (where many of their concerts throughout the year take place) on Saturday, June 18, at 8:00 pm. Tickets are on sale at www.sjcp.com and at the door.
Later this year, the Choral Project will travel to Tolosa, Spain, to participate in an exclusive choral competition. After doing very well at the California International Choral Festival in San Luis Obispo, the group received an invitation to the 2011 Tolosa International Choral Competition based on the recommendation from the conductor of a Basque choir that had also performed in San Luis Obispo.
The winner of the Tolosa Choral Competition goes on to compete against five other competition winners in the European Grand Prix for Choral Singing (despite its name, the contest is open to choral groups from other countries).
If Spain is not in your upcoming travel plans, there are plenty of other nearby opportunities to catch the Choral Project in action. After all, they are a homegrown sensation.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Caption Contest
This is the way it works: someone signs you up to receive The New Yorker. I know people who have received New Yorker subscriptions as a gift, but I've never met anyone who signed up for themselves. I am in the midst of a yearlong free ride myself, enjoying each weekly issue for its fiction, nonfiction, cartoons, and current events. The list of shows and clubs and other goings-on in New York at the beginning of each issue are of less importance. I live rather far away.
The back page of each issue is the Caption Contest.
Readers submit a caption, three are chosen to be voted upon, and then readers vote. The winner gets a framed print with their caption. Pretty decent. I decided at the start of the year that I would participate each and every week, in the hope that I would eventually win and have something to hang on my wall that I really didn't need. For the above cartoon, I thought my contribution was pretty good.
"Perhaps we should downsize the furniture as well."
But no, I didn't make the final cut. These are the three we got to vote on:
"Is that your foot?"
"Should I call and downsize our pizza order?"
"They're outside protesting, sir."
I forget which one I voted for. I only know I couldn't vote for my own because (yet again) mine wasn't chosen. Still I persist. The actual winner was "Is that your foot?" How disappointing.
By my recollection looking over the entire list of submissions, there were somewhere near 5000 entries. So, odds being what they are . . . well, you know. The odds are long.
This week's cartoon:
What would be your caption? (No, I don't want to steal yours, I already submitted mine! I'm just curious. Heck, go online and submit your own. Just tell me first!)
The back page of each issue is the Caption Contest.
Readers submit a caption, three are chosen to be voted upon, and then readers vote. The winner gets a framed print with their caption. Pretty decent. I decided at the start of the year that I would participate each and every week, in the hope that I would eventually win and have something to hang on my wall that I really didn't need. For the above cartoon, I thought my contribution was pretty good.
"Perhaps we should downsize the furniture as well."
But no, I didn't make the final cut. These are the three we got to vote on:
"Is that your foot?"
"Should I call and downsize our pizza order?"
"They're outside protesting, sir."
I forget which one I voted for. I only know I couldn't vote for my own because (yet again) mine wasn't chosen. Still I persist. The actual winner was "Is that your foot?" How disappointing.
By my recollection looking over the entire list of submissions, there were somewhere near 5000 entries. So, odds being what they are . . . well, you know. The odds are long.
This week's cartoon:
What would be your caption? (No, I don't want to steal yours, I already submitted mine! I'm just curious. Heck, go online and submit your own. Just tell me first!)
Friday, April 15, 2011
Newspaper Gods
Pity the last few people hired to work in the old Betamax factory. They thought they were starting the dream job of a lifetime only to have it fizzle within weeks. Also those folks building Edsels long ago. Sure, they might have gone on to work for another automobile manufacturer, but the disappointment must have been palpable.
Industries are born, grow, and some die. Some implode instantly while others dwindle over lengthy periods of time, as if they are on life support. They never actually revive, but they never entirely go away either. Witness the newspaper industry.
As a victim of cable TV, the Internet, and a general lack of interest among the American populace, the newspaper industry has been on its last legs for a long time. Its utter demise has been forecast for many years. Newspapers are going out of business, or merging with former competitors, or shrinking in size and distribution, or replacing reporters with items pulled from the Internet, or substituting advertisements for most articles. This has been going on for a few years now, which makes my entry into the newspaper world back in 2007 a spectacular bit of bad timing.
I started writing commentary pieces for Silicon Valley Community Newspapers just over four years ago. Once or twice a month they allow me to pontificate on whatever subject matter interests me, and they even pay me for the effort. Lately, though, my offerings take a while to come to print because of the restriction in number of pages in each issue. Sometimes the Op-Ed page is completely skipped over.
So it has been a while since I've had a piece in the paper. Fortunately, when I do, it is also available on the San Jose Mercury News web page. Here. This is my latest. Hopefully it isn't my last.
Looks like I picked the perfect time to be a newspaperman. I wonder if I can get a job at the old Betamax factory.
Industries are born, grow, and some die. Some implode instantly while others dwindle over lengthy periods of time, as if they are on life support. They never actually revive, but they never entirely go away either. Witness the newspaper industry.
As a victim of cable TV, the Internet, and a general lack of interest among the American populace, the newspaper industry has been on its last legs for a long time. Its utter demise has been forecast for many years. Newspapers are going out of business, or merging with former competitors, or shrinking in size and distribution, or replacing reporters with items pulled from the Internet, or substituting advertisements for most articles. This has been going on for a few years now, which makes my entry into the newspaper world back in 2007 a spectacular bit of bad timing.
I started writing commentary pieces for Silicon Valley Community Newspapers just over four years ago. Once or twice a month they allow me to pontificate on whatever subject matter interests me, and they even pay me for the effort. Lately, though, my offerings take a while to come to print because of the restriction in number of pages in each issue. Sometimes the Op-Ed page is completely skipped over.
So it has been a while since I've had a piece in the paper. Fortunately, when I do, it is also available on the San Jose Mercury News web page. Here. This is my latest. Hopefully it isn't my last.
Looks like I picked the perfect time to be a newspaperman. I wonder if I can get a job at the old Betamax factory.
Sunday, March 27, 2011
April Fooler
I have never been the greatest April Fool. Mind you, I can be a fool at any time of the year, but as far as perpetrating a good April Fool's joke I have come up a bit short. Nothing that ever really compared to what I considered the standard: my mom calling to the three kids early in the morning, "Snow! It's snowing, kids, run and look!"
My sister, brother, and I ran to the living room shutters and threw them upon . . . to gaze on a sunshiny and blue sky morning. It was April 1 and we lived in San Jose, California. If we had given even a moment for rational consideration we would not have fallen for it. But we were young, sleepy, and Mom was usually a trustworthy sort, so we ran, and looked, and were disappointed, and then laughed. If I remember it practically forty years later you know it must have been good.
I probably pranked my kids when they were young, but nothing really comes to mind. Which makes them not memorable. The one I do remember was when a friend and I taught kindergarten in adjoining rooms back around 2006. I was in Room 13 and Aimee was in Room 14 but we taped paper over those numbers on the classroom doors and wrote the other number. We swapped the pupils' pencil boxes and a few other items to give the semblance of our own rooms.
When the morning bell rang, we opened each other's door and looked at each other's students. I said, "Mrs. Kalivoda is over there" and pointed down to my classroom. Her students scampered to her as mine walked toward me with a thousand questions. The parents looked a bit confused as well.
Escorting the students inside, I pretended that nothing was the matter and proved my thesis by pointing out their pencil boxes. Then I passed out their morning work and told them to get busy. Through the opening to Room 13 we could see Aimee was doing the same thing with her students.
The parents figured it out, laughed, and left. Most of them figured it out. I think a few truly thought we had changed classrooms. Aimee and I continued the joke for a while, with morning read-alouds in the wrong rooms. Then we got back to normal.
Proof that it was successful and memorable: a sixth grader who experienced that joke-of-jokes six years ago just brought it up, telling me how funny it was. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is all the proof I need.
My sister, brother, and I ran to the living room shutters and threw them upon . . . to gaze on a sunshiny and blue sky morning. It was April 1 and we lived in San Jose, California. If we had given even a moment for rational consideration we would not have fallen for it. But we were young, sleepy, and Mom was usually a trustworthy sort, so we ran, and looked, and were disappointed, and then laughed. If I remember it practically forty years later you know it must have been good.
I probably pranked my kids when they were young, but nothing really comes to mind. Which makes them not memorable. The one I do remember was when a friend and I taught kindergarten in adjoining rooms back around 2006. I was in Room 13 and Aimee was in Room 14 but we taped paper over those numbers on the classroom doors and wrote the other number. We swapped the pupils' pencil boxes and a few other items to give the semblance of our own rooms.
When the morning bell rang, we opened each other's door and looked at each other's students. I said, "Mrs. Kalivoda is over there" and pointed down to my classroom. Her students scampered to her as mine walked toward me with a thousand questions. The parents looked a bit confused as well.
Escorting the students inside, I pretended that nothing was the matter and proved my thesis by pointing out their pencil boxes. Then I passed out their morning work and told them to get busy. Through the opening to Room 13 we could see Aimee was doing the same thing with her students.
The parents figured it out, laughed, and left. Most of them figured it out. I think a few truly thought we had changed classrooms. Aimee and I continued the joke for a while, with morning read-alouds in the wrong rooms. Then we got back to normal.
Proof that it was successful and memorable: a sixth grader who experienced that joke-of-jokes six years ago just brought it up, telling me how funny it was. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is all the proof I need.
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Beyond an Ironman
You are probably familiar with the triathlon: swim, bike, and run. The Ironman is the über-triathlon . . . 2.4-mile swim, 112-mile bicycle ride, followed by your garden variety marathon of 26.2 miles. I can only dream of such a thing; I'm just not that much of a swimmer. An acquaintance is competing in the Texas Ironman this May and I look forward to hearing of his adventure.
I have run marathons, 36 to this point. Though truth be told two of those were 50-milers. I have spent time on my feet. Last year I rode my bicycle about 4600 miles. I aspire to a few other achievements, namely the Tahoe Triple (three marathons in three days, encircling the lake) and another 12-hour footrace (rather than how fast can you run a distance, this is how far can you go in an amount of time).
Maybe we're all nuts, but let me tell you, what I have to impart here is really nuts.
In Brooklyn, New York, in 1879, an Englishwoman named Ada Anderson walked 2700 quarter miles in 2700 quarter hours. Consecutively. To rephrase: every fifteen minutes she walked a quarter mile, or one lap around a conventional track. By timing it right, in other words walking one quarter-mile at the beginning of a quarter-hour and walking the next quarter-mile toward the end of the next quarter-hour, she might have twenty minutes rest max. Usually it was more like ten.
And she did this for 28 days, without cease. Every fifteen minutes, a lap. Can you say sleep deprivation? I knew you could.
Two years later, Exilda La Chapelle exceeded this accomplishment in Chicago. She walked 3000 quarter miles in 3000 quarter hours. That's 31 days and change.
No more whining from me about how hard it is to run for four or five hours. Clearly I ain't done nothin' yet. There's a track over at the Campbell Community Center. Maybe I'll look into taking it over for a few hours . . . or a few weeks. Maybe I'll give a go at this insane physical accomplishment. Maybe I'll call Kurtis and see if he wants to join me.
I have run marathons, 36 to this point. Though truth be told two of those were 50-milers. I have spent time on my feet. Last year I rode my bicycle about 4600 miles. I aspire to a few other achievements, namely the Tahoe Triple (three marathons in three days, encircling the lake) and another 12-hour footrace (rather than how fast can you run a distance, this is how far can you go in an amount of time).
Maybe we're all nuts, but let me tell you, what I have to impart here is really nuts.
In Brooklyn, New York, in 1879, an Englishwoman named Ada Anderson walked 2700 quarter miles in 2700 quarter hours. Consecutively. To rephrase: every fifteen minutes she walked a quarter mile, or one lap around a conventional track. By timing it right, in other words walking one quarter-mile at the beginning of a quarter-hour and walking the next quarter-mile toward the end of the next quarter-hour, she might have twenty minutes rest max. Usually it was more like ten.
And she did this for 28 days, without cease. Every fifteen minutes, a lap. Can you say sleep deprivation? I knew you could.
Two years later, Exilda La Chapelle exceeded this accomplishment in Chicago. She walked 3000 quarter miles in 3000 quarter hours. That's 31 days and change.
No more whining from me about how hard it is to run for four or five hours. Clearly I ain't done nothin' yet. There's a track over at the Campbell Community Center. Maybe I'll look into taking it over for a few hours . . . or a few weeks. Maybe I'll give a go at this insane physical accomplishment. Maybe I'll call Kurtis and see if he wants to join me.
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
No Breakthrough
Well, it is always nice to be nominated, even if you don't win. That's what celebrity always say after the Oscars or the Tonys or the Emmys or the . . . other million award ceremonies where celebrities get all celebrified.
It is nice to be nominated. That's why I nominated myself for Amazon's Breakthrough Novel awards last month. I don't know how many were turned away from first round voting, but I survived. And now that the second round cut has been made, I have been vanquished. Summarily dismissed. I am not amongst the 250 still with the potential of being officially published (of course 249 of those people will be soon crying in their soup as I am now, but for right now they are winners!).
This was to be expected. It wasn't as unlikely as, say, winning the lottery, but the odds were against me. And now the odds have fallen on me.
But cheer on with me those who remain, for they are all potential winners. One real winner, but 250 potential winners. And that will have to sustain them until the moment they are disappointed. I will do my part toward restoring their faith in humanity by offering my two self-nominated books, Will Teach For Food and The Average Family, for sale. Here. Other great books are there as well. Take your time while browsing.
Sure, it is nice to be nominated, but it is better to win.
It is nice to be nominated. That's why I nominated myself for Amazon's Breakthrough Novel awards last month. I don't know how many were turned away from first round voting, but I survived. And now that the second round cut has been made, I have been vanquished. Summarily dismissed. I am not amongst the 250 still with the potential of being officially published (of course 249 of those people will be soon crying in their soup as I am now, but for right now they are winners!).
This was to be expected. It wasn't as unlikely as, say, winning the lottery, but the odds were against me. And now the odds have fallen on me.
But cheer on with me those who remain, for they are all potential winners. One real winner, but 250 potential winners. And that will have to sustain them until the moment they are disappointed. I will do my part toward restoring their faith in humanity by offering my two self-nominated books, Will Teach For Food and The Average Family, for sale. Here. Other great books are there as well. Take your time while browsing.
Sure, it is nice to be nominated, but it is better to win.
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
A Postcard You Wouldn't Expect #2
Last week I shared a postcard from 1993. Later the next year, the same fellow sent another greeting to the two girls and their newly arrived brother. So, three kids, aged four years and younger, took a look at the picture of William Shakespeare's birthplace in Stratford-upon-Avon, and then read the following:
Hi [names removed]!
We're having a lovely time in England. We have visited charming English gardens, mighty medieval castles, grand, dramatic cathedrals, Shakespeare's delightful home--pictured here--and the pastoral Lakes. Everything went smoothly until the railroad workers went on strike and shut down the trains. Those bastards. I think I'm going to kick all of their asses.
Love, Uncle [XXXX] and Aunt [XXXX]
Wasn't it nice of him to drag his wife into his unholy message?
Hi [names removed]!
We're having a lovely time in England. We have visited charming English gardens, mighty medieval castles, grand, dramatic cathedrals, Shakespeare's delightful home--pictured here--and the pastoral Lakes. Everything went smoothly until the railroad workers went on strike and shut down the trains. Those bastards. I think I'm going to kick all of their asses.
Love, Uncle [XXXX] and Aunt [XXXX]
Wasn't it nice of him to drag his wife into his unholy message?
Saturday, March 5, 2011
Couples Relay Results
If you read about the race I signed up my wife for without telling her, I can now share the results with you. Actually, even if you didn't read it I can share them.
Kristin and I ran in the 33rd annual Lake Merritt Joggers and Striders' Couples Relay on February 27, 2011. One partner runs around the lake first, and then tags off the second runner. It is just about exactly a 5K for each (3.1 miles). The female runs first. On our team, that would be Kristin. She was worried about coming in last, but as she has never come in last place in any run that was unlikely. The competition did look a bit fierce. Lots of real "runners" in their runner clothes and doing their runner warm ups.
Since it is a Couples Relay, the only results that count are the team results. We came in 150 out of 155, which is definitely not last place. If Kristin tells you that she came in last in the first group of runners, or that nearly twenty teams or so completed both laps before she completed her own, tell her that doesn't matter. Tell her emphatically. She didn't come in last place! In fact, she did her 5K in 44:30, which is a very fine performance indeed. I was able to pass a couple of blokes on my lap, thus are slight rise from last place.
Go Team!
Kristin and I ran in the 33rd annual Lake Merritt Joggers and Striders' Couples Relay on February 27, 2011. One partner runs around the lake first, and then tags off the second runner. It is just about exactly a 5K for each (3.1 miles). The female runs first. On our team, that would be Kristin. She was worried about coming in last, but as she has never come in last place in any run that was unlikely. The competition did look a bit fierce. Lots of real "runners" in their runner clothes and doing their runner warm ups.
Since it is a Couples Relay, the only results that count are the team results. We came in 150 out of 155, which is definitely not last place. If Kristin tells you that she came in last in the first group of runners, or that nearly twenty teams or so completed both laps before she completed her own, tell her that doesn't matter. Tell her emphatically. She didn't come in last place! In fact, she did her 5K in 44:30, which is a very fine performance indeed. I was able to pass a couple of blokes on my lap, thus are slight rise from last place.
Go Team!
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
A Postcard You Wouldn't Expect
There is, in my collection of things, a postcard sent from the Napa Valley to two young girls in San Jose in 1993. The older sister was two years old; the younger, six months. The picture on the front is titled "The Rhine House in Summer" and the preprinted facts on the back say this:
"Beringer Vineyards, the oldest continuously operating winery in the Napa Valley, was founded in 1876 by Frederick and Jacob Beringer. In 1883, this seventeen-room gothic mansion, now known as the Rhine House, was built to be the private residence of Frederick Beringer. It was patterned after the Beringer home on the Rhine River in Mainz, Germany. The home now serves as the winery's hospitality center."
Below that is personal note from the girls' uncle:
Hello [names removed]!
I'm sitting on the can so I thought I'd drop you a line. We were in Napa a couple of weeks ago, but now we're in Washington, D.C. Tomorrow we're going to the White House and the Capitol, etc. Out of all the cities we've visited, I think New York has the most hookers.
Love, Uncle [name removed]
Now that the girls are coming of age, I have decided that this is the right time to unveil this little masterpiece. It is surely a family keepsake that will charm descendants for many years to come.
"Beringer Vineyards, the oldest continuously operating winery in the Napa Valley, was founded in 1876 by Frederick and Jacob Beringer. In 1883, this seventeen-room gothic mansion, now known as the Rhine House, was built to be the private residence of Frederick Beringer. It was patterned after the Beringer home on the Rhine River in Mainz, Germany. The home now serves as the winery's hospitality center."
Below that is personal note from the girls' uncle:
Hello [names removed]!
I'm sitting on the can so I thought I'd drop you a line. We were in Napa a couple of weeks ago, but now we're in Washington, D.C. Tomorrow we're going to the White House and the Capitol, etc. Out of all the cities we've visited, I think New York has the most hookers.
Love, Uncle [name removed]
Now that the girls are coming of age, I have decided that this is the right time to unveil this little masterpiece. It is surely a family keepsake that will charm descendants for many years to come.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Breakthrough
Amazon.com has something called the Breakthrough Novel Awards. It's been around for at least a couple of years, but was new to me a few weeks ago when I heard about it. Apparently you nominate yourself (or perhaps someone can nominate you) and you see what happens. They have two categories: General Fiction and Young Adult Fiction.
Entrants submit a three-hundred word pitch (summary) and a 5,000-word excerpt and a third file that contains the entire work. Those who live in fear of their stuff being hijacked need not apply! The pitch is used to choose 1,000 to go on to the second round of judging. I believe the excerpt is used to whittle the list down further, and the winner, one in each category, receives a publishing contract with Penguin including a $15,000 advance.
Mmm . . . that smells very nice, that amount, doesn't it? And all you have to do is win!
I decided to compile the required items and enter one written work in each category. I chose Will Teach For Food for the Gen Fic and The Average Family for the YA Fic. This afternoon I heard that both made the first cut and are in the second round as one of 1,000 entries. These are not astounding odds, of course, but better than the lottery, and according to the list I downloaded both are near #56. From an alphabetical standpoint, using the author's last name. Listed by title Average Family would be near #1! Will Teach For Food, sadly, would be near the bottom.
None of which really means anything. They'll be announcing the 500 quarter-finalists on March 22, 2011, and I will share the results with you, win or lose. And let's face it, even if I make the next cut, it is unlikely that the fifteen grand is going to end up in my wallet.
But what if . . .
Entrants submit a three-hundred word pitch (summary) and a 5,000-word excerpt and a third file that contains the entire work. Those who live in fear of their stuff being hijacked need not apply! The pitch is used to choose 1,000 to go on to the second round of judging. I believe the excerpt is used to whittle the list down further, and the winner, one in each category, receives a publishing contract with Penguin including a $15,000 advance.
Mmm . . . that smells very nice, that amount, doesn't it? And all you have to do is win!
I decided to compile the required items and enter one written work in each category. I chose Will Teach For Food for the Gen Fic and The Average Family for the YA Fic. This afternoon I heard that both made the first cut and are in the second round as one of 1,000 entries. These are not astounding odds, of course, but better than the lottery, and according to the list I downloaded both are near #56. From an alphabetical standpoint, using the author's last name. Listed by title Average Family would be near #1! Will Teach For Food, sadly, would be near the bottom.
None of which really means anything. They'll be announcing the 500 quarter-finalists on March 22, 2011, and I will share the results with you, win or lose. And let's face it, even if I make the next cut, it is unlikely that the fifteen grand is going to end up in my wallet.
But what if . . .
Friday, February 18, 2011
Too Much Information
My gas meter has apparently acquired the ability to connect to the Internet. If this sort of thing continues with the rest of my appliances, I think I'll move to a cave somewhere.
Read the sad story here.
Read the sad story here.
Saturday, February 12, 2011
Old Fribble
If you aren't familiar with the Motley Fool, it is a personal finance website. If you aren't familiar with Fribbles, they are what the Motley Fool used to publish as reader commentary. The Fool's stated purpose: to educate, amuse & enrich.
If you aren't familiar with Where the Wild Things Are, it is a famous children's book. If you aren't familiar with Maurice Sendak, he is the author of the aforementioned book.
If you aren't familiar with my Fribble, now you can be. (By way of caveat, be it known that on fool.com it is good to be an uppercase-F Fool, and, conversely, bad to be Wise, because the so-called Wise are misguided sheep who don't think for themselves.)
Read on.
If you aren't familiar with Where the Wild Things Are, it is a famous children's book. If you aren't familiar with Maurice Sendak, he is the author of the aforementioned book.
If you aren't familiar with my Fribble, now you can be. (By way of caveat, be it known that on fool.com it is good to be an uppercase-F Fool, and, conversely, bad to be Wise, because the so-called Wise are misguided sheep who don't think for themselves.)
Read on.
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Two years without TV
I wrote the following when the digital television revolution was just getting underway. I was at risk of losing television reception because we operated only with a rooftop antenna. Two years later, we still have the antenna and a snowy screen. At this point I am waiting for a friend or neighbor to upgrade their digital-ready TV to something even bigger and fancier so that I can inherit something that will work.
The Campbell Reporter
Home > The Campbell Reporter Home > Columns
0806 | Friday, February 8, 2008
Columns
Watching TV shouldn't be this difficult
By Matt Baxter
The scurrying, meddling, mysterious people who hastened the demise of my Betamax, my stereo turntable and my easy-to-repair mechanical car have turned their attention to my television. Under the guise of "improvement" and "quality," I am being forced out of my comfortable recliner to research and make the switch to digital television reception.
The only problem is, I don't want to. I am uninterested in HDTV, flat screen behemoths, plasma doodads, or televisions that can communicate with my computer.
There is a sturdy and faithful rooftop antenna on my house that provides all the TV channels I need. Sure, 500-channel people snicker at the eight channels I receive, but they also enjoy a good laugh when they learn I don't have a microwave oven to prepare some sickening buttery popcorn to munch on while I watch the paltry airwave offerings.
It came as some surprise when I was informed that the government was mandating a change to how I watched TV. No more would the antenna suffice. Soon we would be an all-digital nation (apparently a more pressing need than feeding the hungry or housing the homeless), and if I steadfastly stayed with my antenna all I would receive as of early 2009 would be a screen full of static.
I hear fancy words in the media to describe the reasons for the change: "freeing up parts of the valuable broadcast spectrum for public safety communications," and "providing consumers with a more efficient technology and even more channels" (because 500 isn't enough).
The truth is it boils down to two things: increasing television set sales and auctioning some of this broadcast spectrum to wireless companies. In other words, reason No. 1 is money, and reason No. 2 is money. Does this surprise you?
Knowing full well that there is a subset of the American people who don't jump onto each miraculous technology as soon as it is developed, or even as soon as "everyone must have it," the folks in charge have tried to offer some middle ground. A small, inexpensive box will be available that will somehow translate the digital transmission through my antenna and into my TV.
Don't ask me how it works. I can no longer explain how my car works either, now that the engine compartment is stuffed side-to-side with computers, electronics and magic. Whatever happened to having room to shove my wrench in and replace a part?
To entice stalwart revolutionaries who are fully prepared to throw out their TVs in defiance of this new world order, coupons for $40 are being offered to offset the cost of this "enchanted converter box" or whatever they are calling it. And because the government truly cares about me (witness the 114-page love letter it just delivered titled "2007 1040 Forms & Instructions") it will offer me two. That's practically $80! All I had to do was go online and order the coupons.
Hmm, online ... that would be that Internet thing I keep hearing about, right? Well, without such access at home I would have to wait until I was at work. Or maybe the public library, where they still have books that don't need a digital converter thingamajig to read. I've got plenty of time, I'll get the coupons later.
But wait, the government says, this is really important and we don't want you to miss another episode of your favorite TV show (which is currently not in production because of the Hollywood writers' strike) so call this toll-free number and order your coupons. Surely even you, a grumpy and anti-social Neo-Luddite, have a telephone?
Well, yes, as a matter of fact I do. So I dial the number and a recorded message asks me to press 1 for English, followed by further instructions in other languages, none of which I understand. I look at my rotary phone and recall that its numbers don't have "buttons" but actually have "holes" into which I insert my finger to "dial" the phone (which, incidentally, took quite some time with all those eights and nines and zeroes). There is no 1 to "press."
I hang up the phone. Perhaps I should just give in and purchase the super-duper high-tech television that I am being herded toward. But no! If I give in now, what will happen next? Is my refrigerator substandard because one of its door hinges is held together with a twisted-up paperclip? Will I be required to trade in my broom and rusty push mower for powered versions? Can I not just heat up leftovers on my stovetop rather than nuking them?
Watching TV isn't supposed to be this hard. I think I'm going to go to the library right now, but not for their online access.
I'm going to check out a few good books.
The Campbell Reporter
Home > The Campbell Reporter Home > Columns
0806 | Friday, February 8, 2008
Columns
Watching TV shouldn't be this difficult
By Matt Baxter
The scurrying, meddling, mysterious people who hastened the demise of my Betamax, my stereo turntable and my easy-to-repair mechanical car have turned their attention to my television. Under the guise of "improvement" and "quality," I am being forced out of my comfortable recliner to research and make the switch to digital television reception.
The only problem is, I don't want to. I am uninterested in HDTV, flat screen behemoths, plasma doodads, or televisions that can communicate with my computer.
There is a sturdy and faithful rooftop antenna on my house that provides all the TV channels I need. Sure, 500-channel people snicker at the eight channels I receive, but they also enjoy a good laugh when they learn I don't have a microwave oven to prepare some sickening buttery popcorn to munch on while I watch the paltry airwave offerings.
It came as some surprise when I was informed that the government was mandating a change to how I watched TV. No more would the antenna suffice. Soon we would be an all-digital nation (apparently a more pressing need than feeding the hungry or housing the homeless), and if I steadfastly stayed with my antenna all I would receive as of early 2009 would be a screen full of static.
I hear fancy words in the media to describe the reasons for the change: "freeing up parts of the valuable broadcast spectrum for public safety communications," and "providing consumers with a more efficient technology and even more channels" (because 500 isn't enough).
The truth is it boils down to two things: increasing television set sales and auctioning some of this broadcast spectrum to wireless companies. In other words, reason No. 1 is money, and reason No. 2 is money. Does this surprise you?
Knowing full well that there is a subset of the American people who don't jump onto each miraculous technology as soon as it is developed, or even as soon as "everyone must have it," the folks in charge have tried to offer some middle ground. A small, inexpensive box will be available that will somehow translate the digital transmission through my antenna and into my TV.
Don't ask me how it works. I can no longer explain how my car works either, now that the engine compartment is stuffed side-to-side with computers, electronics and magic. Whatever happened to having room to shove my wrench in and replace a part?
To entice stalwart revolutionaries who are fully prepared to throw out their TVs in defiance of this new world order, coupons for $40 are being offered to offset the cost of this "enchanted converter box" or whatever they are calling it. And because the government truly cares about me (witness the 114-page love letter it just delivered titled "2007 1040 Forms & Instructions") it will offer me two. That's practically $80! All I had to do was go online and order the coupons.
Hmm, online ... that would be that Internet thing I keep hearing about, right? Well, without such access at home I would have to wait until I was at work. Or maybe the public library, where they still have books that don't need a digital converter thingamajig to read. I've got plenty of time, I'll get the coupons later.
But wait, the government says, this is really important and we don't want you to miss another episode of your favorite TV show (which is currently not in production because of the Hollywood writers' strike) so call this toll-free number and order your coupons. Surely even you, a grumpy and anti-social Neo-Luddite, have a telephone?
Well, yes, as a matter of fact I do. So I dial the number and a recorded message asks me to press 1 for English, followed by further instructions in other languages, none of which I understand. I look at my rotary phone and recall that its numbers don't have "buttons" but actually have "holes" into which I insert my finger to "dial" the phone (which, incidentally, took quite some time with all those eights and nines and zeroes). There is no 1 to "press."
I hang up the phone. Perhaps I should just give in and purchase the super-duper high-tech television that I am being herded toward. But no! If I give in now, what will happen next? Is my refrigerator substandard because one of its door hinges is held together with a twisted-up paperclip? Will I be required to trade in my broom and rusty push mower for powered versions? Can I not just heat up leftovers on my stovetop rather than nuking them?
Watching TV isn't supposed to be this hard. I think I'm going to go to the library right now, but not for their online access.
I'm going to check out a few good books.
Friday, February 4, 2011
Pants on Fire
Liar, liar, pants on fire, hangin' on a telephone wire.
Here is my recent newspaper column on the issue.
Here is my recent newspaper column on the issue.
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Press Release: Beer Maker
SAN JOSE, CA - Author Matt Baxter answers the question, "What do you do when you have too much free time and too much money" in his new novel, Beer Maker (294 pages, $14.99), available from lulu.com.The story:
Alex Krieger has a lot of problems. He made too much money working for Digital Tombstone, Inc. during its lucrative start-up phase. He has too much free time after quitting his job. He has access to too much free beer from his father’s bar. These are not common problems for the average twenty-eight-and-a-half-year-old, and Alex has difficulty finding anyone who can relate.
Friends encourage him to get back to work. His girlfriend disturbs him with her odd sexual idiosyncrasy. And he organizes a Thirtieth Anniversary party for his parents with his father’s half-hearted help while keeping his mother in the dark. It is a thankless task, for which no one, oddly enough, thanks him.
Alex goes on a quest to find a hobby and possible career. He leaves no stone unturned, as long as the stones can be found in liquor stores, taverns, and home brewing retail shops. He turns to the part-time clean-up guy at his father’s bar for advice, and they start making beer at home.
Then, thwarted by an oddly dressed sociopath from the home brew store, a fellow who calls himself Mad Czech, Alex finds he has a whole new set of problems.
Monday, January 31, 2011
Lawnmower Man
We live in a cul-de-sac of twelve houses. Been here for nearly nineteen years. Six or seven of them have changed hands since we moved here, taking us ever closer to the top of the list of "longest term neighbor." Kristin probably met just about everyone who ever lived on our short street. I didn't start getting outside and meeting the folks until 1999, so a few escaped without ever getting to know me.
Poor dears.
I didn't even wave as cars came and went at first. I'd pull in the driveway after work and wouldn't step outside again unless it was time to mow the lawn or go back to work, so I didn't see a lot of cars go by. When I did, though, I'd reach down to tie an already-tied shoe or I'd look back at the house as if trying to remember something.
Eventually I stayed out longer and met people and found they were all pretty nice. There have even been a couple of block parties over the past few years. I wave at people, they wave at me. Some have had kids that befriended my own, and I have been a substitute teacher for the next wave of youngsters. We notice if another's garage door is open late into the evening, and we loan each other tools and books and spices, and we wheel each other's emptied garbage and recycling bins back to the house if we are out doing our own. Well, one guy does it. In fact, he walks the entire short block and brings up everyone's cans. Nice guy. Little weird, though.
To the best of my understanding, the family next to ours bought the house next to theirs, one of the corner lots, a few years ago. Then, they bought another one at the bottom of the street, giving them three of the twelve houses. This was a little while ago during a real estate heyday, and I don't know how that's working out for them. It's none of my business. One facet of the deal, though, is working out nicely for me.
I haven't maintained a front lawn for a few years now. It gets green in the rainy season, and it is now, and in the summer it is neatly cropped hay. Doesn't get watered, doesn't grow. It's not a weed patch, but as I say, this is a semi-arid plain, people. Your lawns are unnatural! The problem is when it does grow because of the damned rain, it is thick and hearty, and not particularly well-suited to my push mower. Thus, summer mowing is unnecessary, and winter mowing is a curse.
Until now. Mr. Multiple Home Owner, in all his intrepid do-it-yourselfness, recently purchased a riding mower, purportedly for his three nearby properties and others he has elsewhere. Because we are the closeknit helpful kind of people previously described, once he began mowing his three yards on our street he figured he might as well do a little kindness for neighbors. After all, he motors from one end of the block to the other, seeing as he owns a corner lot and one at the turnaround, why not take care of a few others. So now, on mowing day, he does just that. He decamps the mower from its trailer, and spends thirty minutes mowing up and down the block.
He was just here ten minutes ago. I heard the mower and could tell he was in my front yard. I smiled to myself and checked off one more item on my To-Do list.
Even though the service is convenient, I'm still not going to water my yard this year. I'll give the guy one less yard to worry about for at least six months.
Poor dears.
I didn't even wave as cars came and went at first. I'd pull in the driveway after work and wouldn't step outside again unless it was time to mow the lawn or go back to work, so I didn't see a lot of cars go by. When I did, though, I'd reach down to tie an already-tied shoe or I'd look back at the house as if trying to remember something.
Eventually I stayed out longer and met people and found they were all pretty nice. There have even been a couple of block parties over the past few years. I wave at people, they wave at me. Some have had kids that befriended my own, and I have been a substitute teacher for the next wave of youngsters. We notice if another's garage door is open late into the evening, and we loan each other tools and books and spices, and we wheel each other's emptied garbage and recycling bins back to the house if we are out doing our own. Well, one guy does it. In fact, he walks the entire short block and brings up everyone's cans. Nice guy. Little weird, though.
To the best of my understanding, the family next to ours bought the house next to theirs, one of the corner lots, a few years ago. Then, they bought another one at the bottom of the street, giving them three of the twelve houses. This was a little while ago during a real estate heyday, and I don't know how that's working out for them. It's none of my business. One facet of the deal, though, is working out nicely for me.
I haven't maintained a front lawn for a few years now. It gets green in the rainy season, and it is now, and in the summer it is neatly cropped hay. Doesn't get watered, doesn't grow. It's not a weed patch, but as I say, this is a semi-arid plain, people. Your lawns are unnatural! The problem is when it does grow because of the damned rain, it is thick and hearty, and not particularly well-suited to my push mower. Thus, summer mowing is unnecessary, and winter mowing is a curse.
Until now. Mr. Multiple Home Owner, in all his intrepid do-it-yourselfness, recently purchased a riding mower, purportedly for his three nearby properties and others he has elsewhere. Because we are the closeknit helpful kind of people previously described, once he began mowing his three yards on our street he figured he might as well do a little kindness for neighbors. After all, he motors from one end of the block to the other, seeing as he owns a corner lot and one at the turnaround, why not take care of a few others. So now, on mowing day, he does just that. He decamps the mower from its trailer, and spends thirty minutes mowing up and down the block.
He was just here ten minutes ago. I heard the mower and could tell he was in my front yard. I smiled to myself and checked off one more item on my To-Do list.
Even though the service is convenient, I'm still not going to water my yard this year. I'll give the guy one less yard to worry about for at least six months.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
State of the Bunion
I applaud our Commander-in-chief, the Elected One, the one and only Barack Obama (and let's just say with that name he is of course the "one and only"; that's no "Robert Smith" type of name) for taking to the airwaves and the Informational Superhighway to bring up the national horror of the bunion. That scourge of the foot, that most unsightly bump, has no celebrity-sponsored charity and is generally hidden away like your grandmother's goiter.
Regardless whether you think President Obama was born in this country, or whether you think he is a rabid socialist, or whether you think his only aim in life is to take this country swiftly to ruin (by the way, if you think any of those things, you might be an idiot), you must certainly agree with me that he has not shied away from affairs of the foot. Those afflicted with bunions are crying in their beers at this very moment, knowing that relief is coming. Stem cell research might help, or perhaps studying bunions on rats. Either way, my wife will be happy. I'm not saying she has a bunion, heaven's no, outing her in that regard would be tantamount to saying she's got the ugly feets.
For the record, I like my wife's feet.
And as the president said earlier tonight, "The state of our bunion is strong." I can only assume that he will be sending me a check soon so that I can get my wife that bunion surgery.
Not that she has a bunion, mind you, this is just preventive medicine I'm talking about. Really, people, stop with the mindless rumormongering.
And now, the Republican response . . .
Regardless whether you think President Obama was born in this country, or whether you think he is a rabid socialist, or whether you think his only aim in life is to take this country swiftly to ruin (by the way, if you think any of those things, you might be an idiot), you must certainly agree with me that he has not shied away from affairs of the foot. Those afflicted with bunions are crying in their beers at this very moment, knowing that relief is coming. Stem cell research might help, or perhaps studying bunions on rats. Either way, my wife will be happy. I'm not saying she has a bunion, heaven's no, outing her in that regard would be tantamount to saying she's got the ugly feets.
For the record, I like my wife's feet.
And as the president said earlier tonight, "The state of our bunion is strong." I can only assume that he will be sending me a check soon so that I can get my wife that bunion surgery.
Not that she has a bunion, mind you, this is just preventive medicine I'm talking about. Really, people, stop with the mindless rumormongering.
And now, the Republican response . . .
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
F*c*
Last year I signed up on Facebook. My kids were all on it, my wife, my sister, lots of other people I knew. Lots of people I knew weren't on as well. So I gave it a try and watched for a week or two and then said, "Forget this!"
At that point I deactivated my account and thought nothing more of it. It hadn't introduced me to anyone I didn't know already, and those folks I wanted to converse with I already did via email or the phone. Or, like, you know, in person. The way communication has always worked.
A few weeks later, without really thinking about it, I typed facebook.com on the computer browser and, lo and behold, once I put in my password (*******2 . . . what? you thought I'd tell you what it is?) my whole facebook life came back in full living color. My friends, my family, my stupid comments. They had saved each and every one of them and waited patiently for me to return. That was how I knew the facebook really loved me.
Except now I was a tad acrimonious. I labeled it f***book as some sort of dodge, and friends and I ended up calling it f-star. I checked it regularly but usually was sickened by my own behavior within moments. I didn't want to be on f-star. I even figured out that I could call it f*c*book because it looked even more profane than f***book. I used it and hated it (though it came in handy when I was on the great southwest motorcycle tour last September). I didn't know what to do, so I did what I always do when I don't know what to do. I went overboard.
I deactivated my account again, but I went further this time. I dug around online and found that the deactivation only works until you put in your signon and password again, and then you are 100% back in it. Except you could request that your entire f*c*book persona be deleted entirely, as long as you were willing to wait the two weeks before your request would be completed. If at anytime you signed on during those two weeks, BAM!, you were back in it. I made the request late last fall, and kept my frantic fingers away from the keyboard, and then I was gone. Dust. My account could not be reactivated, it was as if I had never been on the f*c*. Just like I wanted it.
From that point on I was happy to be the guy without the f*c*book account. Just like i am the guy happy to be without a cellular telephone, a microwave oven, or cable TV. Happy happy happy. I thought I would live out the rest of my days, during the f*c*book scandals and system updates and movie excitement, without ever worrying about it again. The wife was still on it, as were the kids, and whoever pass as friends, but I was free and clear.
In the past two weeks I was advised by a radio DJ who was interviewing me on air about my new novel (Beer Maker, available soon!) and by a literary agent listening to me pitch a memoir of mine (Census Man) that I should really consider f*c*book as a means of publicity and promotion and information and all around good fun. It took me all of two days to give in and sign up (again) and begin harassing all of those good people who were once my online friends as well as clicking on anyone who showed up as a possible friend. At this point it is all about promotion of self. Something that gets under my skin, quite frankly, but if I don't do it, who the hell will?
So, welcome me back. I'm unhappy to be here.
At that point I deactivated my account and thought nothing more of it. It hadn't introduced me to anyone I didn't know already, and those folks I wanted to converse with I already did via email or the phone. Or, like, you know, in person. The way communication has always worked.
A few weeks later, without really thinking about it, I typed facebook.com on the computer browser and, lo and behold, once I put in my password (*******2 . . . what? you thought I'd tell you what it is?) my whole facebook life came back in full living color. My friends, my family, my stupid comments. They had saved each and every one of them and waited patiently for me to return. That was how I knew the facebook really loved me.
Except now I was a tad acrimonious. I labeled it f***book as some sort of dodge, and friends and I ended up calling it f-star. I checked it regularly but usually was sickened by my own behavior within moments. I didn't want to be on f-star. I even figured out that I could call it f*c*book because it looked even more profane than f***book. I used it and hated it (though it came in handy when I was on the great southwest motorcycle tour last September). I didn't know what to do, so I did what I always do when I don't know what to do. I went overboard.
I deactivated my account again, but I went further this time. I dug around online and found that the deactivation only works until you put in your signon and password again, and then you are 100% back in it. Except you could request that your entire f*c*book persona be deleted entirely, as long as you were willing to wait the two weeks before your request would be completed. If at anytime you signed on during those two weeks, BAM!, you were back in it. I made the request late last fall, and kept my frantic fingers away from the keyboard, and then I was gone. Dust. My account could not be reactivated, it was as if I had never been on the f*c*. Just like I wanted it.
From that point on I was happy to be the guy without the f*c*book account. Just like i am the guy happy to be without a cellular telephone, a microwave oven, or cable TV. Happy happy happy. I thought I would live out the rest of my days, during the f*c*book scandals and system updates and movie excitement, without ever worrying about it again. The wife was still on it, as were the kids, and whoever pass as friends, but I was free and clear.
In the past two weeks I was advised by a radio DJ who was interviewing me on air about my new novel (Beer Maker, available soon!) and by a literary agent listening to me pitch a memoir of mine (Census Man) that I should really consider f*c*book as a means of publicity and promotion and information and all around good fun. It took me all of two days to give in and sign up (again) and begin harassing all of those good people who were once my online friends as well as clicking on anyone who showed up as a possible friend. At this point it is all about promotion of self. Something that gets under my skin, quite frankly, but if I don't do it, who the hell will?
So, welcome me back. I'm unhappy to be here.
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Pitchapalooza
This is American Idol for the literary set. Stand up, pitch your idea for a book, and try to get publishing professionals interested in your idea. You never know where it will lead, and your odds of winning are much better than the lottery, which is, like, one in kajillions.
I heard of this Pitchapalooza event from my mom, who passed along an email from one of the presenters, Alice LaPlante. Alice, along with Arielle Eckstut and David Henry Sterry (authors of The Essential Guide to Getting Your Book Published), were offering an open mic of sorts at Kepler's Books in Menlo Park, California. Having been recently uninspired at a meeting of the California Writers Club at a local Borders Bookstore, I planned on watching from the fringes, just to see what was going on. Kristin and I took the motorcycle so the afternoon wouldn't be a complete waste. At least we'd get a nice early winter sunny ride!
There were plenty of chairs when we arrived, mostly empty. Kristin staked out a seat near the front and dropped her jacket. I ambled between the bookstacks. Eventually we settled on seats about ten rows back. Folks weren't exactly filling the rows. A gray haired dude in a purple jacket (turned out to be host David Henry Sterry) started a pad of paper at the front and one at the back. He said that if you planned on pitching your book idea you should add your name, email, and occupation. At first I planned on just passing along the pad when it came my way, but as usual Kristin knew what was good for me long before I did. She prodded me with questions, such as which book I could talk about, and what would I say.
I have written a few books, that is true. Available online via a so-called self-publishing outfit. In the old days they were called vanity presses. Whether I haven't marketed them well, or they aren't marketable, I am not the one to judge. Kristin and I talked about the humor column collections and a mid-grade book called Fixing Scissors and a memoir called Census Man. I was still not convinced I should volunteer myself for the ignominy, especially when it was divulged that those pitching would stand at the podium with the microphone alongside the three judges. We'd be pitching to the crowd as well as the professionals! I knew I shouldn't.
But what if I did? We chatted about Census Man and decided it was a lifeless title. We joked about what I could say ("In a world where Census Man wanders the streets . . .") and I knew I had no business volunteering. Which meant that of course I should, so when the pad of paper appeared I wrote down my information and passed it on. As the program officially began we were told that the pitching would go on for an hour, they'd randomly choose from the names, and not everyone would necessarily get a chance, but anyone who purchased their new book would get a thirty minute consult at some point in the future (a $100 value!).
The first called forth was a fellow who did a pretty good job in his sixty seconds. The judges had a few positive comments for him (we were told there was no "Simon" amongst them) and then a woman stepped up to give her pitch. Then they called the third name.
Me.
Holy crap. I wandered to the front and tried to remember what Kristin and I had talked about. One judge nodded to me and started the stopwatch. I decided to skip over the preliminaries that nearly half of the people would start with ("Can you hear me?" and "My name is . . ." and "Okay, what this book is about is . . .") and I just launched into it.
"Get Off My Porch!" I said to a healthy dose of laughter. "This is the true story of a ragtag group of 2010 census workers who battle an untested handheld computer device and meet lonely old folks, suspicious conspiracy theorists, and a number of angry animals, including dogs, cats, and one duck."
That was it. I was done. The crowd laughed as did the three judges. They seemed to like the idea and their most pointed comment was that I should have used more of my allotted sixty seconds. Point taken. Eighteen more people stepped forward, including a ten-year-old girl who did a great job. Kristin and I figured I was in the top five, and maybe the top three if I was lucky. Eventually they chose a deserving woman as champion, whose history of the sari (I believe she might have titled it Saritorial) sounded like a great idea for a book.
She is not guaranteed publication, but the judges would put her in contact with the right people who might make it all come true. I purchased their new book and got them to sign it, and I will get a thirty-minute telephone conference in the next month or so to further discuss Census Man and its possibilities. I could probably mention some of my other works as well. There was another agent in the audience whose business card I collected and I will contact him in the next couple of weeks with a query on one or more of my written works.
All in all, a great experience. Couldn't have done it without my mom, and my wife, and Kepler's Books. Thanks to one and all.
Remember: you knew me when.
I heard of this Pitchapalooza event from my mom, who passed along an email from one of the presenters, Alice LaPlante. Alice, along with Arielle Eckstut and David Henry Sterry (authors of The Essential Guide to Getting Your Book Published), were offering an open mic of sorts at Kepler's Books in Menlo Park, California. Having been recently uninspired at a meeting of the California Writers Club at a local Borders Bookstore, I planned on watching from the fringes, just to see what was going on. Kristin and I took the motorcycle so the afternoon wouldn't be a complete waste. At least we'd get a nice early winter sunny ride!
There were plenty of chairs when we arrived, mostly empty. Kristin staked out a seat near the front and dropped her jacket. I ambled between the bookstacks. Eventually we settled on seats about ten rows back. Folks weren't exactly filling the rows. A gray haired dude in a purple jacket (turned out to be host David Henry Sterry) started a pad of paper at the front and one at the back. He said that if you planned on pitching your book idea you should add your name, email, and occupation. At first I planned on just passing along the pad when it came my way, but as usual Kristin knew what was good for me long before I did. She prodded me with questions, such as which book I could talk about, and what would I say.
I have written a few books, that is true. Available online via a so-called self-publishing outfit. In the old days they were called vanity presses. Whether I haven't marketed them well, or they aren't marketable, I am not the one to judge. Kristin and I talked about the humor column collections and a mid-grade book called Fixing Scissors and a memoir called Census Man. I was still not convinced I should volunteer myself for the ignominy, especially when it was divulged that those pitching would stand at the podium with the microphone alongside the three judges. We'd be pitching to the crowd as well as the professionals! I knew I shouldn't.
But what if I did? We chatted about Census Man and decided it was a lifeless title. We joked about what I could say ("In a world where Census Man wanders the streets . . .") and I knew I had no business volunteering. Which meant that of course I should, so when the pad of paper appeared I wrote down my information and passed it on. As the program officially began we were told that the pitching would go on for an hour, they'd randomly choose from the names, and not everyone would necessarily get a chance, but anyone who purchased their new book would get a thirty minute consult at some point in the future (a $100 value!).
The first called forth was a fellow who did a pretty good job in his sixty seconds. The judges had a few positive comments for him (we were told there was no "Simon" amongst them) and then a woman stepped up to give her pitch. Then they called the third name.
Me.
Holy crap. I wandered to the front and tried to remember what Kristin and I had talked about. One judge nodded to me and started the stopwatch. I decided to skip over the preliminaries that nearly half of the people would start with ("Can you hear me?" and "My name is . . ." and "Okay, what this book is about is . . .") and I just launched into it.
"Get Off My Porch!" I said to a healthy dose of laughter. "This is the true story of a ragtag group of 2010 census workers who battle an untested handheld computer device and meet lonely old folks, suspicious conspiracy theorists, and a number of angry animals, including dogs, cats, and one duck."
That was it. I was done. The crowd laughed as did the three judges. They seemed to like the idea and their most pointed comment was that I should have used more of my allotted sixty seconds. Point taken. Eighteen more people stepped forward, including a ten-year-old girl who did a great job. Kristin and I figured I was in the top five, and maybe the top three if I was lucky. Eventually they chose a deserving woman as champion, whose history of the sari (I believe she might have titled it Saritorial) sounded like a great idea for a book.
She is not guaranteed publication, but the judges would put her in contact with the right people who might make it all come true. I purchased their new book and got them to sign it, and I will get a thirty-minute telephone conference in the next month or so to further discuss Census Man and its possibilities. I could probably mention some of my other works as well. There was another agent in the audience whose business card I collected and I will contact him in the next couple of weeks with a query on one or more of my written works.
All in all, a great experience. Couldn't have done it without my mom, and my wife, and Kepler's Books. Thanks to one and all.
Remember: you knew me when.
Friday, January 14, 2011
Matt on the Radio
I read an excerpt of my new novel, Beer Maker, on the radio recently. You can listen to it right here, right now!
Be warned: it runs about 26 minutes including the pre-reading interview with KFJC DJ Ann Arbor. Maybe get something to drink before you press play.
You can also download it in case you want to keep a copy of it forever and forever. You might want to. It is that good. And, no, I'm not biased. Ha.
Click here to download. It is about 25 MB so it might take a few minutes, especially if you are too cheap to pay for DSL or cable.
Happy listening. I look forward to your positive and supportive comments.
Be warned: it runs about 26 minutes including the pre-reading interview with KFJC DJ Ann Arbor. Maybe get something to drink before you press play.
You can also download it in case you want to keep a copy of it forever and forever. You might want to. It is that good. And, no, I'm not biased. Ha.
Click here to download. It is about 25 MB so it might take a few minutes, especially if you are too cheap to pay for DSL or cable.
Happy listening. I look forward to your positive and supportive comments.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
'011
I've spent the last decade or so complaining about how people refer to our year numbers. For the first thirty-eight years of my life, ever since that lovely May day in 1962 when I sprang forth to ruin the world, things were going along all right. It was "nineteen" and the next two digits. Nineteen-seventy-nine. Nineteen-ninety-one. Stuff like that.
As 1999 ticked by I eagerly awaited the cross over to the next. If you were alive then, and you remember, there were many funny people thinking the world was going to end. Elevators would plummet to earth, traffic lights would blink out, and computer systems would crash. I thought it was funny because I thought it was all rather unlikely. Turns out I was right. Yay for me.
Then we hit 2000 and things began to go bad. I'm not talking the computer problems, I'm talking about how we said the new year. There was far too much of "the year 2000" rather than just "2000." I realize that it was an aberration, a very weird looking and weird sounding year, but there was no reason to wrap it up in the uncomfortable "year 2000." To this very day some people perpetuate this absurdity. I find it annoying.
Things calmed for a while. Two-thousand-one was all right, although if truth be told it should have followed the conventional nineteen-hundred-one from one hundred years earlier. Twenty-oh-one would have been better. Perhaps if we had done it that way we wouldn't be in the difficulty in which we are currently mired.
Two-thousand-two (twenty-oh-two). And so on until two-thousand-nine.
By the time we landed in 2010 last year it should have been clear to all thinking adults (and some particularly bright children like mine, and maybe yours) that we should say twenty-ten. It's easier than two-thousand-ten and we didn't say one-thousand-nine-hundred-ten, we said nineteen-ten. Clearly the first two digits of the year number should be addressed together. It is 20 and something, so I hope you pass along this message of hope and prosperity to everyone you know and tell them how to properly say the year.
Because some of the people you know are starting to annoy the hell out of me. Until we can get this corrected, I am going to return the favor. I will say twenty-eleven on occasion, but in the grand tradition of '08 and '09 I will call this year '011 (oh-eleven) and I am going to keep it up until the two-thousand thing is eradicated from our common language.
Who's with me?!
As 1999 ticked by I eagerly awaited the cross over to the next. If you were alive then, and you remember, there were many funny people thinking the world was going to end. Elevators would plummet to earth, traffic lights would blink out, and computer systems would crash. I thought it was funny because I thought it was all rather unlikely. Turns out I was right. Yay for me.
Then we hit 2000 and things began to go bad. I'm not talking the computer problems, I'm talking about how we said the new year. There was far too much of "the year 2000" rather than just "2000." I realize that it was an aberration, a very weird looking and weird sounding year, but there was no reason to wrap it up in the uncomfortable "year 2000." To this very day some people perpetuate this absurdity. I find it annoying.
Things calmed for a while. Two-thousand-one was all right, although if truth be told it should have followed the conventional nineteen-hundred-one from one hundred years earlier. Twenty-oh-one would have been better. Perhaps if we had done it that way we wouldn't be in the difficulty in which we are currently mired.
Two-thousand-two (twenty-oh-two). And so on until two-thousand-nine.
By the time we landed in 2010 last year it should have been clear to all thinking adults (and some particularly bright children like mine, and maybe yours) that we should say twenty-ten. It's easier than two-thousand-ten and we didn't say one-thousand-nine-hundred-ten, we said nineteen-ten. Clearly the first two digits of the year number should be addressed together. It is 20 and something, so I hope you pass along this message of hope and prosperity to everyone you know and tell them how to properly say the year.
Because some of the people you know are starting to annoy the hell out of me. Until we can get this corrected, I am going to return the favor. I will say twenty-eleven on occasion, but in the grand tradition of '08 and '09 I will call this year '011 (oh-eleven) and I am going to keep it up until the two-thousand thing is eradicated from our common language.
Who's with me?!
Sunday, January 9, 2011
On the air
This week I will be reading an excerpt of my new novel, Beer Maker, on the radio! You can listen in, if you want. Wednesday, January 12 is the date. 7:15 a.m. is the approximate time. KFJC, 89.7 FM in the Bay Area, is the station. Also accessible at kfjc.org. There might be a brief pre-reading interview, followed by about twenty minutes from the story.
The novel is the result of my fourth year of Nanowrimo participation. That would be National Novel Writing Month, when folks attempt to write 50,000 words between November 1 and November 30. I hit about 64,000 words in 2010. I am currently editing the novel and should be sending it out to publishers in late February or early March.
So, listen in. If you'd like. This will be my second time on KFJC, my first was in early 2009 when I read a portion of my second Nanowrimo novel Fixing Scissors (available, by the way, along with my other books, at lulu.com. I can't say I sounded exactly lively, being rather nervous and all, but I am taking the proper steps to improve this time around. And no, not with any early morning alcohol.
The novel is the result of my fourth year of Nanowrimo participation. That would be National Novel Writing Month, when folks attempt to write 50,000 words between November 1 and November 30. I hit about 64,000 words in 2010. I am currently editing the novel and should be sending it out to publishers in late February or early March.
So, listen in. If you'd like. This will be my second time on KFJC, my first was in early 2009 when I read a portion of my second Nanowrimo novel Fixing Scissors (available, by the way, along with my other books, at lulu.com. I can't say I sounded exactly lively, being rather nervous and all, but I am taking the proper steps to improve this time around. And no, not with any early morning alcohol.
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
The year of the bicycle
For many years I had a road bicycle, a blue one handed down by my sister after she upgraded. It was a bit small for me, but the handlebars and seat could be raised to the point that the lack of size was inconsequential. The most disturbing thing about the bike was that the shifters were located down underneath the cross bar on the frame. Of course, the bike was nearing twenty years old at the time; probably was state of the art when she first got it.
More recently I began storing a variety of bicycle parts as Lisa and her friend Dirk continued upgrading various road bicycles. I had wheels, handlebars, a seat, and many other components. I delayed doing anything about it for quite some time, probably to their consternation. Eventually, in December 2009, I ordered a frame and a few necessary parts online and Dirk built a great bicycle. Best of all, the shifters were in the brake levers! Oh, so easy . . .
I set a goal of riding 3000 miles on the bicycle in calendar year 2010. I am known for choosing out-of-this-world goals, often of a physical nature. Yes, I had been a regular runner for ten years, but there was no indication that I would be interested in riding regularly enough to reach 3000 miles. But I did it anyway. The daily average, to reach 3000, would be 8.11 miles.
January 1: 10.86. January 2: 13.36. Two days in and I already had 7 excess miles. This was going to be easy! Then I didn't ride for six days and I was 41 miles behind.
Oops.
By the end of April I had ridden 61% of the days and had kept up the 8.11 average. I was on my way to 3000, and feeling completely unimpressed with my effort. If I could reach 3000 miles with barely breaking a sweat, what was the point? Something had to be done, so I changed the goal to 4000 miles, which left my eight months to ride 3000 miles. Sometimes I am my own worst enemy.
Several things changed, though. May weather is much nicer than the dreary winter months. Plus the school year was winding down and so I would be called for fewer substitute teaching jobs. I aimed to go out each and every day on the bicycle, even if for only three or five miles, and I did. The first day I skipped after May 1 was June 4, Kristin's birthday. Then I was sick in late June and skipped two more. The next day I missed was September 21, a day I spend riding the motorcycle from Prescott, Arizona, to San Jose, California, after visiting daughter Kate. Seven hundred miles in fifteen hours; I figured I could take the day off.
But I had just concluded 89 days in a row on the bicycle, a surefire way to bulk up on miles. Even traveling to Las Vegas, staying there for a couple of days, and spending four days in Prescott, I didn't miss a day. Even after my beautiful Dirk-built bicycle was stolen from the garage some time on August 30 and I had to revert to the old, heavy blue bicycle (before buying a new Cannondale on November 14) for two and a half months.
After missing September 21, the only other day I didn't ride for the rest of the year (for the rest of the year) was October 16, when I participated in an Amazing Race-style footrace with friend Kurtis . . . which we won, by the way. Rode every day in November, every day in December, rain or shine, or rain. Since May 1 I had only skipped five days, a near 98% success rate. Which no doubt made it that much easier to reach, and exceed, the goal.
The final tally was 4623 miles. High month: July, 582 miles. Closed out the year with 76 days in a row.
A silly goal, a valiant effort, a number of roadblocks, and a patient family. That's the recipe for success, people.
More recently I began storing a variety of bicycle parts as Lisa and her friend Dirk continued upgrading various road bicycles. I had wheels, handlebars, a seat, and many other components. I delayed doing anything about it for quite some time, probably to their consternation. Eventually, in December 2009, I ordered a frame and a few necessary parts online and Dirk built a great bicycle. Best of all, the shifters were in the brake levers! Oh, so easy . . .
I set a goal of riding 3000 miles on the bicycle in calendar year 2010. I am known for choosing out-of-this-world goals, often of a physical nature. Yes, I had been a regular runner for ten years, but there was no indication that I would be interested in riding regularly enough to reach 3000 miles. But I did it anyway. The daily average, to reach 3000, would be 8.11 miles.
January 1: 10.86. January 2: 13.36. Two days in and I already had 7 excess miles. This was going to be easy! Then I didn't ride for six days and I was 41 miles behind.
Oops.
By the end of April I had ridden 61% of the days and had kept up the 8.11 average. I was on my way to 3000, and feeling completely unimpressed with my effort. If I could reach 3000 miles with barely breaking a sweat, what was the point? Something had to be done, so I changed the goal to 4000 miles, which left my eight months to ride 3000 miles. Sometimes I am my own worst enemy.
Several things changed, though. May weather is much nicer than the dreary winter months. Plus the school year was winding down and so I would be called for fewer substitute teaching jobs. I aimed to go out each and every day on the bicycle, even if for only three or five miles, and I did. The first day I skipped after May 1 was June 4, Kristin's birthday. Then I was sick in late June and skipped two more. The next day I missed was September 21, a day I spend riding the motorcycle from Prescott, Arizona, to San Jose, California, after visiting daughter Kate. Seven hundred miles in fifteen hours; I figured I could take the day off.
But I had just concluded 89 days in a row on the bicycle, a surefire way to bulk up on miles. Even traveling to Las Vegas, staying there for a couple of days, and spending four days in Prescott, I didn't miss a day. Even after my beautiful Dirk-built bicycle was stolen from the garage some time on August 30 and I had to revert to the old, heavy blue bicycle (before buying a new Cannondale on November 14) for two and a half months.
After missing September 21, the only other day I didn't ride for the rest of the year (for the rest of the year) was October 16, when I participated in an Amazing Race-style footrace with friend Kurtis . . . which we won, by the way. Rode every day in November, every day in December, rain or shine, or rain. Since May 1 I had only skipped five days, a near 98% success rate. Which no doubt made it that much easier to reach, and exceed, the goal.
The final tally was 4623 miles. High month: July, 582 miles. Closed out the year with 76 days in a row.
A silly goal, a valiant effort, a number of roadblocks, and a patient family. That's the recipe for success, people.
Saturday, January 1, 2011
No year resolutions
There is a backlash against the new year resolution industry. Enough people have shown that the hastily made resolution has virtually no chance of success. It is too easy to proclaim a plan of exercising more, drinking less, or not shooting backyard wildlife. If there is no true commitment, failure is certain. Especially when there is no follow up, either. Perhaps if people were called before Congress in mid-February to report on the success (or not) of their resolutions there might be more lasting results.
Instead we get drunk (and then resolve to drink less) before promising to exercise more (while downing a third slice of new year's cake) and digging through the hall closet for gun and ammo.
More and more people are mocking the resolution business. I might be right now, if you look closely. I've read of people poking fun and making promises to drink and eat more and exercise less. At least that way they'll meet with success. Other people refuse to make resolutions altogether. Whatever comes of their year will happen spontaneously. Which sounds like a perfect recipe for failure and/or disaster. If you fail to plan, you plan to fail.
I just realized I've always hated that saying.
I don't resolve to do anything for this newly arrived new year. I have plans to do some running. I'd also like to avoid as much work as possible, so resolving to run could be problematic if I decide that running is adding to my workload. I could make a new year's resolution to survive the next twelve months, but that is not entirely within my control. Accidents happen, after all, and sometimes backyard neighbors are aiming at a crow or squirrel and mistakenly shoot someone.
That someone could be me. And just think: if I had a job I'd be there instead of at home getting peppered with buckshot by the guy next door. I should resolve to move to a safer neighborhood, but that would be like a dog chasing its own tail. A neverending quest for satisfaction.
There is no such thing as "safety." It is a cruel and random universe, which is probably why new year's resolutions fail. Let this be the beginning of the "no year resolution."
Just say no. But don't resolve to say no.
Instead we get drunk (and then resolve to drink less) before promising to exercise more (while downing a third slice of new year's cake) and digging through the hall closet for gun and ammo.
More and more people are mocking the resolution business. I might be right now, if you look closely. I've read of people poking fun and making promises to drink and eat more and exercise less. At least that way they'll meet with success. Other people refuse to make resolutions altogether. Whatever comes of their year will happen spontaneously. Which sounds like a perfect recipe for failure and/or disaster. If you fail to plan, you plan to fail.
I just realized I've always hated that saying.
I don't resolve to do anything for this newly arrived new year. I have plans to do some running. I'd also like to avoid as much work as possible, so resolving to run could be problematic if I decide that running is adding to my workload. I could make a new year's resolution to survive the next twelve months, but that is not entirely within my control. Accidents happen, after all, and sometimes backyard neighbors are aiming at a crow or squirrel and mistakenly shoot someone.
That someone could be me. And just think: if I had a job I'd be there instead of at home getting peppered with buckshot by the guy next door. I should resolve to move to a safer neighborhood, but that would be like a dog chasing its own tail. A neverending quest for satisfaction.
There is no such thing as "safety." It is a cruel and random universe, which is probably why new year's resolutions fail. Let this be the beginning of the "no year resolution."
Just say no. But don't resolve to say no.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)