Thursday, February 10, 2011

Two years without TV

I wrote the following when the digital television revolution was just getting underway. I was at risk of losing television reception because we operated only with a rooftop antenna. Two years later, we still have the antenna and a snowy screen. At this point I am waiting for a friend or neighbor to upgrade their digital-ready TV to something even bigger and fancier so that I can inherit something that will work.

The Campbell Reporter
Home > The Campbell Reporter Home > Columns
0806 | Friday, February 8, 2008
Columns
Watching TV shouldn't be this difficult

By Matt Baxter

The scurrying, meddling, mysterious people who hastened the demise of my Betamax, my stereo turntable and my easy-to-repair mechanical car have turned their attention to my television. Under the guise of "improvement" and "quality," I am being forced out of my comfortable recliner to research and make the switch to digital television reception.

The only problem is, I don't want to. I am uninterested in HDTV, flat screen behemoths, plasma doodads, or televisions that can communicate with my computer.

There is a sturdy and faithful rooftop antenna on my house that provides all the TV channels I need. Sure, 500-channel people snicker at the eight channels I receive, but they also enjoy a good laugh when they learn I don't have a microwave oven to prepare some sickening buttery popcorn to munch on while I watch the paltry airwave offerings.

It came as some surprise when I was informed that the government was mandating a change to how I watched TV. No more would the antenna suffice. Soon we would be an all-digital nation (apparently a more pressing need than feeding the hungry or housing the homeless), and if I steadfastly stayed with my antenna all I would receive as of early 2009 would be a screen full of static.

I hear fancy words in the media to describe the reasons for the change: "freeing up parts of the valuable broadcast spectrum for public safety communications," and "providing consumers with a more efficient technology and even more channels" (because 500 isn't enough).

The truth is it boils down to two things: increasing television set sales and auctioning some of this broadcast spectrum to wireless companies. In other words, reason No. 1 is money, and reason No. 2 is money. Does this surprise you?

Knowing full well that there is a subset of the American people who don't jump onto each miraculous technology as soon as it is developed, or even as soon as "everyone must have it," the folks in charge have tried to offer some middle ground. A small, inexpensive box will be available that will somehow translate the digital transmission through my antenna and into my TV.

Don't ask me how it works. I can no longer explain how my car works either, now that the engine compartment is stuffed side-to-side with computers, electronics and magic. Whatever happened to having room to shove my wrench in and replace a part?

To entice stalwart revolutionaries who are fully prepared to throw out their TVs in defiance of this new world order, coupons for $40 are being offered to offset the cost of this "enchanted converter box" or whatever they are calling it. And because the government truly cares about me (witness the 114-page love letter it just delivered titled "2007 1040 Forms & Instructions") it will offer me two. That's practically $80! All I had to do was go online and order the coupons.

Hmm, online ... that would be that Internet thing I keep hearing about, right? Well, without such access at home I would have to wait until I was at work. Or maybe the public library, where they still have books that don't need a digital converter thingamajig to read. I've got plenty of time, I'll get the coupons later.

But wait, the government says, this is really important and we don't want you to miss another episode of your favorite TV show (which is currently not in production because of the Hollywood writers' strike) so call this toll-free number and order your coupons. Surely even you, a grumpy and anti-social Neo-Luddite, have a telephone?

Well, yes, as a matter of fact I do. So I dial the number and a recorded message asks me to press 1 for English, followed by further instructions in other languages, none of which I understand. I look at my rotary phone and recall that its numbers don't have "buttons" but actually have "holes" into which I insert my finger to "dial" the phone (which, incidentally, took quite some time with all those eights and nines and zeroes). There is no 1 to "press."

I hang up the phone. Perhaps I should just give in and purchase the super-duper high-tech television that I am being herded toward. But no! If I give in now, what will happen next? Is my refrigerator substandard because one of its door hinges is held together with a twisted-up paperclip? Will I be required to trade in my broom and rusty push mower for powered versions? Can I not just heat up leftovers on my stovetop rather than nuking them?

Watching TV isn't supposed to be this hard. I think I'm going to go to the library right now, but not for their online access.

I'm going to check out a few good books.

No comments:

Post a Comment